TOPICAL MORPHINE IN A CANINE MODEL - A PILOT-STUDY

Citation
Dp. Moore et al., TOPICAL MORPHINE IN A CANINE MODEL - A PILOT-STUDY, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 79(9), 1998, pp. 1034-1037
Citations number
39
Categorie Soggetti
Rehabilitation,"Sport Sciences
ISSN journal
00039993
Volume
79
Issue
9
Year of publication
1998
Pages
1034 - 1037
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-9993(1998)79:9<1034:TMIACM>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
Objective: To determine if topical morphine can enter the synovial cav ity and the effect of ultrasound on this process. Design: A randomized control trial to investigate which body fluids morphine enters after topical application. Setting: A university animal laboratory. Subjects : Ten mongrol dogs raised by the Comparative Medicine Department. All animals were certified to be free of disease, all had received standar d scheduled immunizations, and none had been used for any other resear ch. Intervention: Topical morphine and ultrasound or topical morphine and sham ultrasound was applied to the knees of the dogs. Samples were obtained afterward from synovial fluid, serum, and urine, and were an alyzed for the presence of morphine. Main Outcome Measures: Blood samp les were collected every 60 minutes for 240 minutes, urine samples wer e collected at 120 minutes and 240 minutes, and synovial joint fluid w as collected at 120 minutes and 240 minutes. The process of collection and analysis was the same for dogs treated with topical morphine and ultrasound and those treated with topical morphine and sham ultrasound . Fisher's exact test was used to test for an association between the use of ultrasound and the presence of morphine in the synovial fluid, serum, or urine. Two-sample t tests were used to test for group differ ences in mean body weight. Results: All samples (synovial fluid, serum , and urine) were negative at time zero. All of the subsequent serum s amples were negative for morphine. Two or three of the dogs in each gr oup of five (ultrasound or sham ultrasound) had positive urine and syn ovial fluid samples at 120 and 240 minutes. Ultrasound did not affect the results. Body weight of the dogs influenced the results, with ligh ter animals having a significantly larger percentage (p = .03) of syno vial fluid samples positive for morphine. Conclusion: Ultrasound did n ot affect the absorption of topical morphine in this canine model. Bod y weight may have influenced the results. Dens that tested positive fo r morphine in synovial fluid had a lower mean body weight than dogs th at did not test positive (p = .03). (C) 1998 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medici ne and Rehabilitation.