An evaluation is made of Goldberg's (1992) 100 Unipolar Markers of the
five-factor model of personality. The factor structure of these items
in samples of older men from the Normative Aging Study and undergradu
ate students are examined, and both item transformation and consistenc
y testing approaches are used to evaluate replications of the five-fac
tor structure. Results show that the five-factor structure is difficul
t to replicate in the sample of older men. While item transformations
and sample trimming based on a consistency test did improve the qualit
y of the replication in this older, nonstudent sample, both methods ha
ve serious drawbacks. The five factor solution appeared in the student
sample without sample trimming or data transformation. Additionally,
in both student and nonstudent samples, oblique rotation resulted in i
nter-factor correlations relevant to more general issues in the study
of trait structure. We conclude that the 100 Unipolar Markers may be u
nsuitable for use in older populations or with nonstudent samples.