RENAL ANATOMIC CHANGES ON MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING AND GADOLINIUM-ENHANCED MAGNETIC-RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY AFTER RENAL REVASCULARIZATION -ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION
Rc. Carlos et al., RENAL ANATOMIC CHANGES ON MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING AND GADOLINIUM-ENHANCED MAGNETIC-RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY AFTER RENAL REVASCULARIZATION -ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION, Investigative radiology, 33(9), 1998, pp. 660-669
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES. The anatomic and hemodynamic renal changes a
fter renal arterial revascularization (TZAR) were investigated. METHOD
S. Thirty-seven kidneys and 40 renal arteries were evaluated in 20 pat
ients by using magnetic resonance imaging/magnetic resonance angiograp
hy (MRI/MRA) to assess pre- and post-PAR renal length and mass, parenc
hymal thickness, renal enhancement, renal artery caliber, poststenotic
dilation, and signal dephasing on 3D phase contrast (PC). The kidneys
and renal arteries were segregated into three groups. Group 1 include
d 16 patients who benefited from RAR (defined as clinical improvement
based on decreased serum creatinine or fewer number of antihypertensiv
e medications) in whom 26 renal arteries in 25 kidneys were studied. I
ntervention included renal artery endarterectomy (n = 20); aortorenal
bypass (n = 3); renal artery reimplantation (n = 3); and percutaneous
transluminal angioplasty (PTA; n = 1), A total of 27 interventions was
performed, as PTA failed for one patient who subsequently underwent a
ortorenal bypass before reimaging, Group 2 included four patients who
did not clinically benefit. A total of eight revascularized arteries w
ere studied in seven kidneys. In group 3, six renal arteries in five k
idneys from groups I and 2 without RAS/RAR were analyzed as an interna
l control. RESULTS. Technical success (defined as increased vessel cal
iber after intervention) was achieved in 33 of the 34 revascularized a
rteries. A statistically significant increase in renal length occurred
regardless of clinical outcome (pre-RAR, 9.5 cm; post-RAR, 10.5 cm: P
< 0.0001). Parenchymal thickness and renal mass, however, improved on
ly in patients who benefited clinically from RAR. Parenchymal enhancem
ent was unchanged in any of the groups studied. No significant morphol
ogic changes were detected in the control group. CONCLUSIONS. Magnetic
resonance imaging and Gd-h IRA detect anatomic and hemodynamic change
s that occur with renal revascularization.