Jd. Cassidy et al., THE SASKATCHEWAN HEALTH AND BACK PAIN SURVEY - THE PREVALENCE OF LOW-BACK-PAIN AND RELATED DISABILITY IN SASKATCHEWAN ADULTS, Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 23(17), 1998, pp. 1860-1866
Study Design. Population-based, cross-sectional, mailed survey. Object
ives. To determine the lifetime, 6-month period, and point prevalence
of low back pain and its related disability among Saskatchewan adults
and to investigate the presence and strength of selective response bia
s. Summary of Background Data. There have been many reports of the pre
valence of low back pain in different populations, and the estimates v
ary widely depending on case definition. However, most studies fail to
differentiate between trivial and disabling back pain, which raises t
he issue of the usefulness of these estimates, No studies have yet doc
umented the prevalence of graded low back pain severity and its relate
d disability in a North American, general, population-based survey. Me
thods, The Saskatchewan Health and Back Pain Survey was mailed to a pr
obability sample of 2184 Saskatchewan adults between 20 and 69 years o
f age. Fifty-five percent of the eligible population responded to the
survey. Respondents were compared with nonrespondents, and the presenc
e of selective response bias by back pain status was investigated by w
ave analysis. the point and lifetime prevalence of low back pain was d
etermined by simple questions, and the B-month period prevalence of lo
w back pain was determined by the Chronic Pain Questionnaire. All esti
mates were age-standardized to the Saskatchewan population. Results. T
he authors estimate that at the lime of the survey 28.4% (95% confiden
ce interval, 25.6-31.1) of the Saskatchewan adult population were expe
riencing low back pain, and 84.1% (95% confidence interval, 81.9-86.3)
had experienced it during their lifetime. Overall, 48.9% (95% confide
nce interval, 45.9-52.0) of the population had experienced low-intensi
ty/low-disability low back pain in the previous 6 months, 12.3% (95% c
onfidence interval, 10.3-14.4) had experienced high-intensity/low-disa
bility low back pain, and an additional 10.7% (95% confidence interval
, 8.8-12.5) had experienced high-disability low back;pain in the previ
ous 6 months. There was little variation in the estimates over age gro
ups, but women experienced more high-disability back pain than men. Th
ere was no evidence of selective response bias by low back pain status
in the survey. Conclusion. Low-intensity/low-disability low back pain
is a common problem in the general population. Approximately 11% of t
he adult population studied had been disabled by low back pain in the
previous 6 months.