In Scientific Knowledge, Barry Barnes, David Bloor and John Henry (BBH
) explicitly repudiate the notion that the physical environment prays
no role in the creation of scientific knowledge, thereby removing a ma
jor bone of fruitless and heated contention between scientists and pra
ctitioners of the sociology of scientific knowledge (SSK). There remai
n, however, many aspects of BBH's view of scientific knowledge that cl
ash with my own experience as a practitioner of (theoretical) physics.
I offer some examples of ways in which BBH seem to get things wrong,
in the hope of starting a more constructive dialogue, leading to a bet
ter understanding of sociology by scientists, and perhaps even vice-ve
rsa.