The clock paradox arising from the special theory of relativity contin
ues to puzzle and confuse some of the scientific community. The Establ
ishment view is that there is no problem and that the theory predicts
that time dilation of moving bodies results in asymmetric aging. It is
also claimed that there is conclusive evidence for this in (I) the ex
tended lifetimes of high-velocity meson beams, and (2) the observed di
fferences in recorded times between clocks that have been flown around
the Earth compared with those that have remained on the ground. On th
e other hand, there are a number of scientists who still do not accept
this interpretation of the ''conclusive evidence'' and are led to que
stion the validity of the special theory of relativity. The authors of
the present paper accept special relativity theory, but argue that it
s correct interpretation does not lead to asymmetric aging. The genera
lly accepted resolution of the clock paradox is set out, objections to
this accepted resolution are made, and an alternative resolution is p
resented. The evidence for asymmetric aging is examined. The alternati
ve explanation allowing time dilation to occur without invoking asymme
tric aging hinges on the tenet of special relativity theory that event
s simultaneous for one observer will not generally be simultaneous for
another observer moving with high relative velocity. Taking this into
account, the apparent asymmetric aging effects disappear. Existing ex
perimental evidence in the behavior of decelerated cosmic rays support
s this explanation. In addition, it is argued that the accepted interp
retation of the results of the celebrated ''around-the-world flying cl
ocks'' experiment is in error and that the correct interpretation of t
hese results supports the present authors' explanation.