Rh. Borgwardt, METHANOL PRODUCTION FROM BIOMASS AND NATURAL-GAS AS TRANSPORTATION FUEL, Industrial & engineering chemistry research, 37(9), 1998, pp. 3760-3767
Two processes are examined for production of methanol. They are assess
ed against the essential requirements of a future alternative fuel for
road transport: that it (i) is producible in amounts comparable to th
e 19 EJ of motor fuel annually consumed in the U.S., (ii) minimizes em
issions of criteria pollutants, (iii) reduces greenhouse gas emissions
from production and use, (iv) is cost-competitive with petroleum fuel
, and (v) is compatible with the emerging vehicle technologies, especi
ally those powered by fuel cells. The methanol yield, production cost,
and potential for reduction of overall fuel-cycle CO2 emissions were
evaluated and compared to those of reformulated gasoline. The results
show that a process utilizing natural gas and biomass as cofeedstocks
can meet the five requirements more effectivly than individual process
es utilizing those feedstocks separately. When end-use efficiencies ar
e accounted for, the cost per vehicle mile traveled would be less than
that of gasoline used in current vehicles. CO2 emissions from the veh
icle fleet would be reduced 66% by methanol used in fuel cell vehicles
and 8-36% in flexible-fuel or dedicated-methanol vehicles during the
transition period. Methanol produced from natural gas and biomass, tog
ether in one process, and used in fuel cell vehicles would leverage pe
troleum displacement by a factor of about 5 and achieve twice the over
all CO2 emission reduction obtainable from the use of biomass alone.