PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE OF ELECTRICAL ALTERNANS VERSUS SIGNAL-AVERAGED ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY IN PREDICTING THE OUTCOME OF ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL TESTING AND ARRHYTHMIA-FREE SURVIVAL
Aa. Armoundas et al., PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE OF ELECTRICAL ALTERNANS VERSUS SIGNAL-AVERAGED ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY IN PREDICTING THE OUTCOME OF ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL TESTING AND ARRHYTHMIA-FREE SURVIVAL, HEART, 80(3), 1998, pp. 251-256
Objective-To investigate the accuracy of signal averaged electrocardio
graphy (SAECG) and measurement of microvolt level T wave alternans as
predictors of susceptibility to ventricular arrhythmias. Design-Analys
is of new data from a previously published prospective investigation.
Setting-Electrophysiology laboratory of a major referral hospital. Pat
ients and interventions-43 patients, not on class I or class III antia
rrhythmic drug treatment, undergoing invasive electrophysiological tes
ting had SAECG and T wave alternans measurements. The SAECG was consid
ered positive in the presence of one (SAECG-I) or two (SAECG-II) of th
ree standard criteria. T wave alternans was considered positive if the
alternans ratio exceeded 3.0. Main outcome measures-Inducibility of s
ustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation during electrophysiol
ogical testing, and 20 month arrhythmia-free survival. Results-The acc
uracy of T wave alternans in predicting the outcome of electrophysiolo
gical testing was 84% (p < 0.0001). Neither SAECG-I (accuracy 60%; p <
0.29) nor SAECG-II (accuracy 71%; p < 0.10) was a statistically signi
ficant predictor of electrophysiological testing. SAECG, T wave altern
ans, electrophysiological testing, and follow up data were available i
n 36 patients while not on class I or III antiarrhythmic agents. The a
ccuracy of T wave alternans in predicting the outcome of arrhythmia-fr
ee survival was 86% (p < 0.030). Neither SAECG-I (accuracy 65%; p < 0.
21) nor SAECG-II (accuracy 71%; p < 0.48) was a statistically signific
ant predictor of arrhythmia-free survival. Conclusions-T wave alternan
s was a highly significant predictor of the outcome of electrophysiolo
gical testing and arrhythmia-free survival, while SAECG was not a stat
istically significant predictor. Although these results need to be con
firmed in prospective clinical studies, they suggest that T wave alter
nans may serve as a non-invasive probe for screening high risk populat
ions for malignant ventricular arrhythmias.