Pc. Williamson et al., LANDMARK IDENTIFICATION ERROR IN SUBMENTOVERTEX CEPHALOMETRICS - A COMPUTERIZED METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE CONDYLAR LONG AXIS, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics, 86(3), 1998, pp. 360-369
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Pathology,Surgery,"Dentistry,Oral Surgery & Medicine
The purpose of this study was to examine the identification error of c
ertain submentovertex landmarks and to compare three different methods
of determining horizontal condylar angulation in submentovertex radio
graphs. To determine landmark identification error, a random sampling
of 12 submentovertex radiographs from preorthodontic patients between
the ages of 10 and 17 years was used to determine both intraexaminer a
nd interexaminer reliability. The error associated with the identifica
tion of each of 11 landmarks varied between specific landmarks, betwee
n the same landmarks bilaterally, and between the vertical and horizon
tal components of the same landmark. In general, intraexaminer data sh
owed less landmark identification error in both vertical and horizonta
l directions than did interexaminer data. The foramen spinosum landmar
ks demonstrated the lowest identification error in both horizontal and
vertical directions (intraexaminer), whereas greater identification e
rror was associated with the condylar lateral poles and posterior cond
ylar points (both intraexaminer and interexaminer). A comparison of th
ree different methods of condylar angulation determination was underta
ken through the use of two tracings of each of 101 submentovertex radi
ographs. A computer-derived method representing the principal axis of
minimum moment of inertia of the condyle was shown to be more reliable
(p < 0.05) with respect to describing condylar angulation than both a
method that used a best-fit line through the anterior condylar border
and an interpolar axis method.