Appraisal smoothing has been widely accepted as an important factor to
consider when analyzing real estate returns using appraisal-based dat
a. In this paper, we demonstrate that the general applicabi:ity of the
appraisal-smoothing arguments developed so far in the literature is l
imited by the assumptions upon which the arguments are based. We furth
er show that the use of appraisal-based data can result in a higher (n
ot lower) variance than that of true returns. Given this, it might be
more fruitful to analyze the unique characteristics of real estate mar
kets as possible explanations for the seemingly low variance observed
in appraisal-based (or transaction-based) return indexes.