A COMPARISON OF PROSTHETIC MATERIALS USED TO REPAIR ABDOMINAL-WALL DEFECTS

Citation
N. Mori et al., A COMPARISON OF PROSTHETIC MATERIALS USED TO REPAIR ABDOMINAL-WALL DEFECTS, Pediatric surgery international, 13(7), 1998, pp. 487-490
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,Pediatrics
ISSN journal
01790358
Volume
13
Issue
7
Year of publication
1998
Pages
487 - 490
Database
ISI
SICI code
0179-0358(1998)13:7<487:ACOPMU>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
Large abdominal wall defects may require a prosthesis for closure. The aim of our study was to identify the best material for abdominoplasty in pediatric patients. One hundred twenty-eight Wistar KY strain male rats (3 weeks old) were used. All animals underwent celiotomy via a m idline skin incision. They were divided into seven groups as follows: the animals in groups 1 through 6 underwent full-thickness abdominal w all excision 3 cm in diameter. The animals in group 1 underwent primar y closure. In groups 2 through 6 the defect was closed with prosthetic material. In Group 7, a sham operation was performed. Daily weights w ere measured. The animals were killed after 3 and 9 weeks. Adhesion sc ores were assigned for each group. Vicryl mesh resulted in the fewest adhesions and had no effect on weight gain in the developing rats.