CROSS-SECTIONAL EPIDEMIOLOGIC SURVEY OF RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS PATIENTSSEEN IN PRIVATE-PRACTICE IN FRANCE - DESCRIPTIVE RESULTS (1629 CASES)

Citation
J. Sany et al., CROSS-SECTIONAL EPIDEMIOLOGIC SURVEY OF RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS PATIENTSSEEN IN PRIVATE-PRACTICE IN FRANCE - DESCRIPTIVE RESULTS (1629 CASES), Revue du rhumatisme, 65(7-9), 1998, pp. 508-516
Citations number
6
Categorie Soggetti
Rheumatology
Journal title
Revue du rhumatisme
ISSN journal
11698446 → ACNP
Volume
65
Issue
7-9
Year of publication
1998
Pages
508 - 516
Database
ISI
SICI code
1169-8446(1998)65:7-9<508:CESORP>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
Objective. To conduct an epidemiological study of rheumatoid arthritis patients seen by office-based rheumatologists in France (first semest er of 1996). Methods. Cross-sectional study of 1629 rheumatoid arthrit is patients conducted by 373 office-based rheumatologists who voluntee red for the study (one visit per patient). Each rheumatologist had to complete a 200-variable questionnaire for the first four rheumatoid ar thritis patients who came to their office. Results. Women contributed 81% of the sample (mean age, 57 years); 19% of patients were seen in t he Paris area, 20% in the North East, 20% in the North West, 22% in th e South East and 19% in the South West. Twenty-nine per cent of patien ts had a paid job and 21.1% (all women) were homemakers. Among the pat ients with a paid job, 44% were on sick leave, with the reason for the sick leave being the rheumatoid arthritis in 36% of cases. Nineteen p er cent of patients had stopped working permanently because of their r heumatoid arthritis, after a mean disease duration of six years. Mean disease duration in the overall sample was eight years. The diagnosis was established within six months of symptom onset in 75% of cases. A family history of rheumatoid arthritis was found in 11% of patients an d a family history of other autoimmune diseases in 2%. The disease was precipitated by a stressful life event in 17% of cases. Follow-up was being provided only by the study rheumatologist in 59% of cases and a lso by a general practitioner in 39%. The disease was quiescent in 9% of cases, minimally active in 32%, moderately active in 46% and severe ly active in 13%. Eighty-four per cent of patients were on one (78%) o r more (6%) second-line drugs including methotrexate (45%), antimalari al (17%), intramuscular gold (14%), tiopronin (9%), D-penicillamine (6 %) and sulfasalazine (12%). Fifty-two per cent of patients were on ste roid therapy (mean dose, 7.5+/-5.7 mg/d). Other drugs included nonster oidal antiinflammatory agents (61%), analgesics (61%), gastroduodenal protective agents (45%) and anxiety-relieving agents (10%). Twenty-fou r per cent of patients had had one or more surgical procedures (mean, 3/patient) for their joint disease. Conclusion. This nation-wide epide miological survey conducted in France provides a database on the socio economic and demographic characteristics of rheumatoid arthritis patie nts followed in private practice.