Ag. Morganti et al., COST-SPARING AND TIME-SPARING SIMPLIFIED CONFORMAL THERAPY FOR PROSTATE-CANCER - IS IT FEASIBLE, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 42(1), 1998, pp. 65-71
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Purpose: It was hypothesized that using a simplified technique of volu
mes profiles determination (STVPD) based on CT data sets (correlate an
d projection) would increase the target dose without increasing the bl
adder and rectal dose obtained by conventional simulation techniques.
To test this hypothesis, patients referred for radical radiation treat
ment for prostate carcinoma were prospectively evaluated by performing
treatment planning using standard simulation, with (SSB) and without
corner blocks (SSWB), STVPD, and 3D beam's eye view. Methods and Mater
ials: Twenty-one patients with prostate carcinoma (stage B: 7; stage C
: 14) underwent four treatment planning procedures where the field arr
angement was defined by standard simulation (SSB and SSWB), STVPD, and
3D beam's eye view (BEV) with a four field (10 MV photons) box techni
que. Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) for the planning target volume (PTV
), bladder, and rectum (relatives to the four techniques) were generat
ed for all patients and compared; average percentage dose to the bladd
er and rectum were also calculated. Results: STVPD and 3D BEV treated
an increased percentage of PTV at 95% isodose level, in comparison to
standard simulation (with and without blocks). No statistically signif
icant differences were found between the two techniques. A significant
reduction of irradiated bladder volume was found between 3D BEV and S
TVPD versus simulation with and without blocks (mean percentage dose:
77.3%, 81.8%, 93.5%, and 92.6% respectively). No marked differences we
re recorded in rectal irradiation (mean percentage dose: 53.1%, 53.7%,
51.9%, and 50.2% respectively). Time required for treatment planning
(excluding CT scan and definitive simulation) was less than 15 minutes
for STVPD and more than 120 minutes for 3D BEV. Conclusion: Our resul
ts confirm the inadequacy of standard simulation. It is possible, with
conformal therapy, to increase the dose to the PTV, decreasing the ir
radiated volume of the bladder. The absence of sparing effect in the r
ectum is discussed. Using a box technique, STVPD can be used routinely
to define the PTV in patients with prostate cancer, reducing the time
required for treatment planning, with dosimetric results similar to t
hose of 3D BEV. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Inc.