School-level assessment of student writing ability using a group-level
, polytomous item response theory (IRT) model was illustrated in this
study. The study supported the viability of an IRT-based school assess
ment as an alternative to the conventional approach based on aggregati
on of individual scores. The precision provided by the assumed assessm
ent design varied dramatically depending on school size and school ave
rage ability. For small schools and students with low average abilitie
s, differences in average school performance had to be quite large to
be trustworthy. In contrast, the design provided greater precision in
detecting differences for large schools and students with high average
abilities. An operational use of this design would require great care
in the reporting of results to ensure that unreliable school comparis
ons are clearly identified.