Recent scholarly and policy attention has been devoted to understandin
g outside interventions in civil conflicts. Using a decision theoretic
model to develop the constraints faced by decision makers, I derive h
ypotheses about the conditions under which we would expect to observe
outside military or economic interventions in civil conflicts. These h
ypotheses are then tested against data on intrastate conflicts and ass
ociated interventions during the post-World War II period. The evidenc
e suggests that both domestic and international considerations influen
ce the decision to intervene, with highly intense conflicts being unli
kely to attract outside actors and those with humanitarian crises quit
e likely to do so. A confounding result suggests that the greater the
number of shared borders, the less likely will be an outside intervent
ion.