S. Jost et al., IMPACT OF THE LOCATION OF RECURRENT STENOSIS ON REVASCULARIZATION AFTER CORONARY PALMAZ-SCHATZ STENT IMPLANTATION, The Journal of invasive cardiology, 10(7), 1998, pp. 376-379
In 69 patients the incidence of target lesion revascularization during
3-year follow-up after single Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation was co
mpared with the in-stent location of recurrent stenoses at 6-month fol
low-up angiography. A stenosis was define as a lesion with > 15% diame
ter stenosis. After stent implantation, 17 mid-type, 10 proximal and 5
distal-type residual stenoses mere found, At follow-up, 56 mid-type,
11 proximal and 6 distal-type stenoses mere measured. Only proximal-ty
pe residual stenoses revealed an increase in diameter stenosis (40 +/-
15% vs 27 +/- 6%; p < 0.05), Five out of 11 patients (45%) with proxi
mal-type recurrent stenoses underwent revascularization during follow-
up versus 8 out of 56 (14%) with mid-type and none of the 6 patients w
ith distal-type stenoses (p = not significant), This clear trend - tow
ard more progression and target lesion revascularization procedures in
proximal-type recurrent stenoses mainly developing from residual sten
oses left after stent implantation - should be verified in larger pati
ent collectives.