Hepatocellular carcinoma occurs almost exclusively in patients with ci
rrhosis, at least in the West. In most of these patients, potential cu
rative treatments, such as resection or percutaneous alcohol injection
, are usually contra-indicated. Transarterial chemoembolization may in
duce tumor necrosis. In order to avoid massive necrosis of the non tum
oral liver, two major contra-indications have been identified: inadequ
ate portal flow and liver failure. The influence of chemoembolization
on survival was thought to be high on the basis of non randomized tria
ls. However, no beneficial effects on survival were observed in three
randomized trials. In these trials, the beneficial effect on tumor nec
rosis was counterbalanced by frequent deleterious effects on liver fun
ction. Moreover, progressive liver atrophy may follow repeated procedu
res. As there is no alternative treatment for most of these patients a
nd chemoembolization can still be beneficial in selected cases, effort
s have been made to improve patient selection and method to improve th
e results. Good liver function, a normal portal flow, and a well limit
ed hypervascularized tumor are necessary conditions for treatment, whi
ch may even be curative when used in association with percutaneous alc
ohol injection. Moreover, arterial embolization can be performed witho
ut chemotherapy, and the procedure should not be repeated in the short
term.