Objectives: To investigate the impact of the postcoital test on the pr
egnancy rate among subfertile couples and on the number of other diagn
ostic tests and treatments. Design: Randomised controlled study. Setti
ng: A university and two non-university teaching hospitals in the Neth
erlands. Subjects: New couples at infertility clinics, 1 March 1993 to
1 October 1995; randomisation to an intervention group (series of inf
ertility investigations that include the postcoital test) or to a cont
rol group (series excluding the test). Main outcome measure: Cumulativ
e pregnancy rate. Results: Of 736 consecutive new couples, 444 fulfill
ed the inclusion criteria and consented to participate (intervention g
roup, 227; control group, 217). Treatment was given more often in the
intervention group than in the control group (54% v 41%; difference 13
% (95% confidence interval 4% to 22%)). Yet cumulative pregnancy rates
at 24 months in the intervention group (49% (42% to 55%)) and the con
trol group (48% (42% to 55%)) were closely similar (difference 1% (-9.
0% to 9.0%)). Conclusion: Routine use of the postcoital test in infert
ility investigations leads to more tests and treatments but has no sig
nificant effect on the pregnancy rate.