Background & Aims: The need for colonoscopy when small tubular adenoma
s with low-grade dysplasia are found on sigmoidoscopy is uncertain. Th
e aim of this study was to examine the prevalence and characteristics
of proximal adenomas in patients with distal adenomas, Methods: We stu
died 981 subjects with distal adenomas found on the index colonoscopy
before randomization in the Polyp Prevention Trial. Results: Four hund
red sixty patients (46.9%) had greater than or equal to 1 distal adeno
ma that was pathologically advanced (villous component, high-grade dys
plasia, or greater than or equal to 1 cm); 21.5% (211 of 981) had any
proximal adenoma; and 4.3% (42 of 981) (95% confidence interval [CI],
3.0-5.5) had an advanced proximal adenoma. A greater percentage of pat
ients with an advanced distal adenoma (5.9%) (95% CI, 3.7-8.0) had an
advanced proximal adenoma compared with those with a nonadvanced dista
l adenoma (2.9%) (95% CI, 1.4-4.3) (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.1-4.3; P = 0.03
). Not performing a colonoscopy in patients with a nonadvanced distal
adenoma would have missed 36% (15 of 42) of the advanced proximal aden
omas, Conclusions: Patients with an advanced distal adenoma are twice
as likely to have an advanced proximal adenoma as patients with a nona
dvanced distal adenoma. However, eschewing a colonoscopy in patients w
ith a nonadvanced distal adenoma would result in not detecting a sizea
ble percentage of the prevalent advanced proximal adenomas. These data
support performance of a colonoscopy in patients with a nonadvanced d
istal adenoma, Confirmation of these results in asymptomatic subjects
undergoing screening sigmoidoscopy is advisable.