B. Danielsson et al., HYPERLIPIDEMIA - DIFFERENCES IN MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES AND ATTITUDES IN2 REGIONS IN EUROPE - SICILY AND THE STOCKHOLM AREA, European journal of epidemiology, 14(5), 1998, pp. 477-482
In order to compare attitudes and management concerning hyperlipidaemi
a and risk factors for coronary heart disease among doctors in norther
n and in southern Europe, a questionnaire study was undertaken among d
octors in primary health care and departments of internal medicine in
Sicily and Stockholm. The regions differed in culture and health-care
structure. Guidelines were similar, but screening of healthy individua
ls was recommended in Sicily, and not in Sweden. One hundred and fifty
-three general practitioners in Sicily and 120 in Stockholm, 211 inter
nists in Sicily and 83 in Stockholm participated. Main outcome measure
s were management policies for investigation and treatment and also at
titudes. Routine lipid checks at first visits were done by few doctors
in Stockholm but by a majority in Sicily (p < 0.001); in the presence
of general cardiovascular risk factors (other than heredity, diabetes
, cardiovascular disease and hypertension), routine checks were carrie
d out more often by both general practitioners (p < 0.001) and interni
sts (p < 0.005) in Stockholm. Drug treatment was initiated at lower ch
olesterol levels for secondary and primary intervention, cardiovascula
r disease, cardiovascular risk factors and hereditary hyperlipidaemia
by both groups in Sicily (p < 0.001), as was dietary treatment. Second
ary prevention was considered important by all groups, but primary pre
vention only by Sicilian doctors. We concluded that there were differe
nces in views and management practice between doctors in Sicily and in
Stockholm on the investigation and treatment of patients with hyperli
pidaemia. Doctors tested lipids at first visits in Sicily but not in S
tockholm. Treatment was initiated at lower levels of cholesterol in Si
cily.