This commentary on the papers given at the Conference on Social Norms,
Social Meaning, and the Economic Analysis of Law at the University of
Chicago Law School summarizes and criticizes the papers briefly; emph
asizes the promise of signaling theory, as illustrated by several of t
he papers, to cast new Light on social interactions, norms, and law; i
nvites attention to the importance of selection phenomena in the opera
tion of norms; underscores the compatibility of economic analysis of l
aw with economic analysis of norms; questions the utility of ''social
meaning'' as an analytic category; and denies that norms analysis cons
titutes a ''paradigm shift'' in the economic approach to law and socia
l control.