Jg. Li et al., APPARENT THERMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS OF LIGAND-BINDING TO THE CLONED RATMU-OPIOID RECEPTOR, European journal of pharmacology, 354(2-3), 1998, pp. 227-237
The apparent thermodynamic parameters of binding of ten ligands to the
cloned rat mu-opioid receptor stably expressed in Chinese hamster ova
ry (CHO) cells were investigated. For every ligand, the K-d or K-i val
ues at 0 degrees C, 12 degrees C, 25 degrees C and 37 degrees C were d
etermined, a van't Hoff plot was generated and Delta H degrees', Delta
S degrees' and -T Delta S degrees' and Delta G degrees' were calculat
ed. Changes in free energy (Delta G degrees') ranged from - 10.35 to -
15.65 kcal/mol. The binding of sufentanil, ohmefentanyl, diprenorphin
e and D-Phe-Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Arg-Tnr-penicillamine-Thr-NH2 (CTAP) was end
othermic (Delta H degrees' > 0) and driven by an increase in entropy (
-T Delta S degrees' = -13.08 to -18.57 kcal/mol). The binding of naltr
exone was exothermic (Delta H degrees' = -12.56 kcal/mol) and essentia
lly enthalpy-driven. The binding of morphine, methadone, pentazocine,
[D-Ala(2), NMePhe(4), Gly-ol]enkephalin (DAMGO) and Tyr-Pro-NMePhe-D-P
ro-NH2 (PL017) was exothermic (Delta H degrees' = -3.53 to -9.95 kcal/
mol) and occurred with an increase in entropy (-T Delta S degrees' = -
2.48 to -7.92 kcal/mol). Plots of enthalpy versus entropy and enthalpy
versus free energy were linear, although enthalpy-entropy compensatio
n was not evident. The entropy changes were not correlated with appare
nt lipophilicity of the compounds. These results suggest that: (1) opi
oid ligands bind to the mu receptor by specific mechanisms, unrelated
to lipid solubility; (2) the mechanism of binding is not universally d
ifferent for peptide and non-peptide Ligands; (3) the nature of bindin
g does not a priori determine intrinsic activity. The results reveal a
novel differentiation of opioid ligands into two groups (group 1. ohm
efentanyl, sufentanil, diprenorphine, CTAP and PL017; group 2. naltrex
one, morphine, methadone, DAMGO, pentazocine), based on two distinct r
elationships between enthalpy versus free energy of binding, the detai
ls of which are yet to be elucidated. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. A
ll rights reserved.