Cl. Bennett et al., COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS COMPARING LIPOSOMAL ANTHRACYCLINES IN THETREATMENT OF AIDS-RELATED KAPOSIS-SARCOMA, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes and human retrovirology, 18(5), 1998, pp. 460-465
Liposomal formulations have been shown to alter the efficacy and toxic
ity profiles of anthracylines for patients with HIV-related advanced K
aposi's sarcoma (KS). Using decision-analysis models, the costs and co
st-effectiveness of the two U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-ap
proved liposomal formulations of these agents were estimated. Estimate
s of costs, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness were derived from cl
inical trial data of separate, randomized phase III trials of pegylate
d liposomal doxorubicin (20 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks) and liposomal dauno
rubicin (40 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks). Clinical response rates were 59% f
or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and 25% for liposomal daunorubicin.
Despite higher acquisition costs fur pegylated liposomal doxorubicin,
total estimated costs of treatment for KS and chemotherapy-related he
matologic toxicities were similar ($7,066 U.S. compared with $6,621 U.
S, for Liposomal daunorubicin). Cost-effectiveness profiles, defined a
s average costs per responder, favored pegylated liposomal doxorubicin
($11,976 U.S./responder versus $26,483 U.S./responder for Liposomal d
aunorubicin), reflecting the higher reported response rate in the phas
e III trial. Sensitivity analyses suggested that the costs and cost-ef
fectiveness results would not differ markedly when evaluated over a ra
nge of assumptions, including response rate, neutropenia rate, and dos
age variations.