Jc. Petruska et al., ANODALLY FOCUSED POLARIZATION OF PERIPHERAL-NERVE ALLOWS DISCRIMINATION OF MYELINATED AND UNMYELINATED FIBER INPUT TO BRAIN-STEM NUCLEI, Experimental Brain Research, 121(4), 1998, pp. 379-390
We investigated the ability of a novel direct current (DC) polarizatio
n technique to block selectively the conduction in peripheral myelinat
ed nerve fibers and allowing propagation in only unmyelinated fibers.
In anesthetized adult rats, distal branches of the sciatic nerve (caud
al cutaneous sural and tibial nerves) were exposed for electrical stim
ulation of A- and C-fibers. Two specially fabricated trough electrodes
of different size and surface area were placed onto the sciatic nerve
. Through these proximal electrodes a controlled ramped DC was timed t
o coincide with the arrival of A- and C-fiber action potentials, evoke
d electrically at the distal nerves or naturally from the foot or ankl
e, with the intent of blocking propagation in A-fibers while allowing
C-fiber throughput. Neuronal recordings were made both peripherally (p
roximal sciatic nerve fascicles or L5 dorsal roots) and centrally (sin
gle cells in the nucleus gracilis or nucleus reticularis gigantocellul
aris). The DC polarization was shown to block conduction in myelinated
A-fibers effectively, while allowing conduction in the unmyelinated C
-fibers, without activation of fibers via the DC polarization itself.
This was dependent upon the following factors: electrode polarity, ons
et rate of polarization, peak amplitude of polarization, distance betw
een polarizing electrodes, size difference between polarizing electrod
es, and gross nerve size. These experiments demonstrate that anodally
focused DC polarization, applied utilizing two trough electrodes of di
fferent sizes, is capable of effectively, reversibly, and reproducibly
blocking conduction in myelinated A-fibers evoked either electrically
or naturally, while still allowing conduction to occur in the unmyeli
nated C-fiber population. In the context of experimental usage, we hav
e demonstrated blocking of low-threshold A-fiber, but not C-fiber, med
iated inputs to the caudal brainstem. This technique should find wide
application in studies involving the processing of information conveye
d centrally by the unmyelinated C-fiber afferent population, including
discriminating afferent responses to peripheral stimuli, the role of
C-fiber input in reflex activity, and the plasticity following injury
or other manipulations.