Physiological measures were recorded during repeated psychophysiologic
al detection of deception (PDD) tests to determine if reaction levels
change with test repetition. Two groups of 22 healthy male subjects co
mpleted six peak of tension PDD tests on each of two test days. A mini
mum between test day interval of six days was maintained. The treatmen
t group was programmed to respond deceptively to one of seven test que
stions while the control group was programmed to respond truthfully to
all questions. The respiration and galvanic skin resistance (GSR) lin
e lengths, GSR peak response amplitude and latency, and cardiovascular
inter-beat-interval (LEI) were calculated for each response. Analyses
indicated that, except for GSR peak response latency, differential ph
ysiological reactivity during a PDD test did not change significantly
over repeated tests or days; there was a decrease in average respirati
on line lengths at the initial test(s) of each day; and differential c
hanges in average respiration line length, GSR peak latency. and cardi
ovascular IBI responses corresponded to deception. Power analyses were
calculated to assist in result interpretation. It is suggested that P
DD decision accuracy, concerning:: subject veracity, should not decrea
se during repeated testing.