A BIOMECHANICAL COMPARISON OF COMPOSITE FIXATION AND VETERINARY ACETABULAR PLATES FOR STABILIZATION OF ACETABULAR OSTEOTOMIES IN DOGS LOADED IN 3-POINT-BENDING FASHION
Oi. Lanz et al., A BIOMECHANICAL COMPARISON OF COMPOSITE FIXATION AND VETERINARY ACETABULAR PLATES FOR STABILIZATION OF ACETABULAR OSTEOTOMIES IN DOGS LOADED IN 3-POINT-BENDING FASHION, Veterinary and comparative orthopaedics and traumatology, 11(3), 1998, pp. 152-157
An in vitro study comparing the biomechanical performance and accuracy
of reduction for two methods of acetabular osteotomy repair in the do
g is presented. Pelves were harvested from five adult mixed breed dogs
weighing 25-30kg. One hemipelvis from each dog was repaired with the
composite fixation and the contralateral hemipelvis was repaired with
a 2.0 mm six hole veterinary acetabular plate. Each hemipelvis was loa
ded in a three-point-bending fashion at a rate of 5 mm/min. An extenso
meter was placed over the dorso-medial surface of the acetabular osteo
tomy during loading. Reduction was significantly better for hemipelves
stabilized with the composite fixation when compared to hemipelves st
abilized with the 2.0 mm six hole veterinary acetabular plate. There w
as not a significant difference in bending stiffness, distractional st
iffness, yield point and maximum load between repair groups.