Meteorological models represent rainfall as a mean value for a grid sq
uare so that when the latter is large, a disaggregation scheme is requ
ired to represent the spatial variability of rainfall. In general circ
ulation models (GCMs) this is based on an assumption of exponentiality
of rainfall intensities and a fixed value of areal rainfall coverage,
dependent on rainfall type. This paper examines these two assumptions
on the basis of U.K. and U.S. radar data. Firstly, the coverage of an
area is strongly dependent on its size, and this dependence exhibits
a scaling law over a range of sizes. Secondly, the coverage is, of cou
rse, dependent on the resolution at which it is measured, although thi
s dependence is weak at high resolutions. Thirdly, the lime series of
rainfall coverages has a long-tailed autocorrelation function which is
comparable to that of the mean areal rainfalls. It is therefore possi
ble to reproduce much of the temporal dependence of coverages by using
a regression of the log of the mean rainfall on the log of the covera
ge. The exponential assumption is satisfactory in many cases but not a
ble to reproduce some of the long-tailed dependence of some intensity
distributions. Gamma and lognormal distributions provide a better fit
in these cases, but they have their shortcomings and require a second
parameter. An improved disaggregation scheme for GCMs is proposed whic
h incorporates the previous findings to allow the coverage to be obtai
ned for any area and any mean rainfall intensity. The parameters requi
red are given and some of their seasonal behavior is analyzed.