Ja. Engels et al., THE EFFECTS OF AN ERGONOMIC-EDUCATIONAL COURSE - POSTURAL LOAD, PERCEIVED PHYSICAL EXERTION, AND BIOMECHANICAL ERRORS IN NURSING, International archives of occupational and environmental health, 71(5), 1998, pp. 336-342
Objectives: To evaluate the results of an ergonomic-educational course
for nurses we assessed the number and percentage of harmful postures
and of ergonomic and biomechanical errors made before and after the co
urse. We also studied the perceived physical exertion. Means and metho
ds: In all, 12 nurses who had participated in the course (trainees) an
d 12 who had not (controls) were recorded on video while performing st
andardized nursing tasks. The wards from which the two groups of nurse
s came were comparable, as were the patient populations. The nurses we
re also comparable in some personal characteristics. The tasks they pe
rformed included washing, lifting, and repositioning a patient as well
as certain tasks other than patient handling. Video recordings were m
ade once before (1-2 weeks) and twice after the course (after 3 months
and after 15 months). The harmful postures, the errors made, and the
ratings of perceived exertion were measured by means of the Ovako Work
ing-posture Analysis System (OWAS), a checklist, and Borg scores, resp
ectively. Results: When the first and last measurements of all the abo
ve tasks taken as a whole were analyzed the trainees showed a signific
ant improvement in the number and percentage of harmful postures and e
rrors, whereas the controls did not. The same could be concluded for l
ifting alone. After the course the new work routine did not appear to
have caused any extra perceived physical exertion. Conclusion: It can
be concluded that the course was successful, although it should be car
efully investigated as to whether nurses remain capable of working saf
ely in daily practice. The work pressure that nurses experience during
their normal duties could prevent them from working safely during eve
ryday work.