Rj. Stubbs et al., COVERT MANIPULATION OF ENERGY DENSITY OF HIGH-CARBOHYDRATE DIETS IN PSEUDO FREE-LIVING HUMANS, International journal of obesity, 22(9), 1998, pp. 885-892
OBJECTIVE: This study examined the effects of varying the energy densi
ty (ED) of high carbohydrate (HC) diets on food and energy intake (EI)
, subjective hunger and body weight in humans. DESIGN: Randomised cros
s-over design. Subjects were each studied twice during 14 d, throughou
t which they had ad libitum access to one of two covertly-manipulated
diets. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Six healthy men (mean age (s.d.)= 32.17 y
s.d. (5.26 y), mean weight = 69.74 kg s.d. (2.75 kg), mean height = 1
.76 m s.d. (0.05 m), body mass index (BMI) = 22.57 (2.2) kg/m(2)) were
studied. The fat, carbohydrate (CHO) and protein content (as % energy
) and ED of each diet were 21 :66:13% and 357 kJ/100 g, (low-energy de
nsity (LED)) or 22: 66: 12% and 629 kJ/100 g (high-energy density (HED
)). A medium fat diet was provided at maintenance (1.6 x BMR, MF for 2
d) before each ad libitum period. Subjects could alter the amount, bu
t not the composition of foods eaten. RESULTS: Mean El was 8.67 and 14
.82 MJ/d on the LED and HED diets, respectively Subjects felt signific
antly more hungry on the LED diet, than on the HED diet (F1(,160)38.28
; P < 0.001) and found the diets to be similarly pleasant (72.72 mm vs
71.54mm (F(1,392)0.31; P = 0.579)). Mean body weight decreased on the
LED diet at a rate of 0.1 kg/d and increased at 0.06 kg/d on the HED
diet (F(1,131)86.60; P < 0.001), giving total weight changes of - 1.41
kg and + 0.84 kg, respectively, both of which were significantly diff
erent from zero (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Excess El is possible on HC, H
ED diets, at least under conditions where diet selection is precluded.
Comparison of these results with previous studies, which altered ED u
sing fat, suggests that CHO may be a better cue for hunger than fat.