The validity of different error types in the d2 Test (Brickenkamp, 199
4) was examined in three studies with 225 healthy and 153 brain-damage
d subjects. The total error score (sum of all errors divided by the nu
mber of items worked on) largely consisted of deletion errors. Items w
hich differed from the targets with respect to two features (letter, n
umber of dashes) were cancelled extremely seldom (''double errors'').
Two kinds of confusion errors (item with wrong number of dashes or wit
h wrong letter cancelled) and deletion errors were slightly correlated
(r(s) =.14 to .42). Correlations with errors in two concentration tes
ts (new test, ''Revisionstest''), as well as with missings and false a
larms in two attention tests, were low (r(s) =.10 to .38). Error score
s correlated with construct divergent variables (tests on intelligence
, short-term and long-term memory, attention) as high as with construc
t convergent variables (r(s) less than or equal to \.51\). Deletion an
d dash errors differed somewhat with respect to their correlations wit
h other variables. Proneness to errors as assessed by the d2 Test seem
s to be a very heterogenous construct. Double errors are discussed as
the optimal indicators of working against instructions or simulation.