Historically, breakdown theory dominated the sociological study of col
lective action. In the 1970s, this theory was found to be increasingly
unable to account for contemporaneous events and newly discovered his
torical facts. Resource mobilization theory displaced breakdown theory
as the dominant paradigm. Yet the evidence against breakdown theory i
s weak once a distinction is made between routine and nonroutine colle
ctive action. Several recent contributions affirm the explanatory powe
r of breakdown theory for nonroutine collective action. Breakdown theo
ry also contributes to an understanding of the use of governmental for
ce against protest and of the moral features of collective action. Bre
akdown and resource mobilization theories explain different types of p
henomena, and both are needed to help account for the full range of fo
rms of collective action.