Bibliographic classification systems purport to organize the world of
knowledge for information storage and retrieval purposes in libraries
and bibliographies, both manual and online. The major systems that hav
e predominated during the twentieth century were originally predicated
on the academic disciplines. This structural principle is no longer a
dequate because multidisciplinary knowledge production has overtaken m
ore traditional disciplinary perspectives and produced communities of
cooperation whose documents cannot. be accommodated in a disciplinary
structure. This paper addresses the problems the major classifications
face; reports some attempts to revise these systems to accommodate mu
ltidisciplinary works more appropriately, and describes some theoretic
al research perspectives that attempt to reorient classification resea
rch toward the pluralistic needs of multidisciplinary knowledge creati
on and the perspectives of different discourse communities. Traditiona
lly, the primary desiderata of classification systems were mutual excl
usivity and joint exhaustivity. The need to respond to multidisciplina
ry research may mean that hospitality mill replace mutual exclusivity
and joint exhaustivity as the most needed and useful characteristics o
f classification systems ill both theory and practice.