Lb. Russell et Em. Rinchik, STRUCTURAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SPECIFIC-LOCUS MUTATIONS INDUCED BY DIFFERENT EXPOSURE REGIMES IN MOUSE SPERMATOGONIAL STEM-CELLS, MUTATION RESEARCH, 288(2), 1993, pp. 187-195
It was first shown by W.L. Russell (1962), and confirmed by him and ot
hers, that a 24-h interval between dose fractions (but not shorter or
longer ones) elevates the rate of radiation-induced spermatogonial spe
cific-locus mutations to levels considerably above the linear extrapol
ation made from lower-dose results. We have now analyzed the nature of
mutations induced either in previously undisturbed or in ''sensitized
'' spermatogonial stem cells, i.e., those that received a challenging
dose of X-rays 24 h following a priming dose. Results are based on mol
ecular studies of a large set of viable albino mutations using probes
derived from the tyrosinase (c) gene and from the regions surrounding
c!, and on retrospective classifications of mutations at c and two ad
ditional loci into LL (large lesions), IG (intragenic mutations), and
OL (other lesions), utilizing criteria developed earlier. A significan
t difference (P = 0.016) was found between previously undisturbed and
sensitized stem-cell spermatogonia; the latter have a higher LL/IG rat
io, similar to the ratio observed for mutations induced in poststem-ce
ll stages. This finding of a qualitative difference indicates that the
additional mutations produced by a 24-h fractionated treatment are th
e result of the second (challenging) dose. The qualitative difference,
further, indicates that the mutation-rate-augmenting effects of 24-h
fractionation are not due, merely, to an increase (caused by the primi
ng dose) of a normally responsive component of the spermatogonial popu
lation. The finding that the additional mutations that are produced by
the challenging dose are primarily large DNA lesions suggests that th
e nuclear state of sensitized stem-cell spermatogonia may be different
from the state of previously undisturbed spermatogonia. This state, w
hich appears to be similar to that of postspermatonial stages, may be
conducive to the formation of LLs, even by agents that are not LL indu
cers in other systems. The results further indicate that the relative
paucity of LLs characteristic of treated (previously undisturbed) sper
matogonial stem cells is probably not the result of selection against
such mutations during subsequent germ-cell development.