Fav. Klaij et al., HUMEROSPINOUS DISTANCE MEASUREMENTS - ACCURACY AND USEFULNESS FOR PREDICTING SHOULDER DYSTOCIA IN DELIVERY AT TERM, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology, 12(2), 1998, pp. 115-119
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Acoustics,"Obsetric & Gynecology","Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Objective To investigate if the humerospinous distance, as an indicato
r of shoulder width, could predict shoulder dystocia at term. Design P
rospective cross-sectional study of a stratified reference group of he
althy women and a test group of women with risk factors for shoulder d
ystocia. Measurements were not revealed. Outcome measures were difficu
lties with delivery of the shoulders and correlation with maternal bod
y mass and birth weight.Subjects Seventy-two women with singleton preg
nancies at a University Clinic: 32 women at 39-42 weeks for reference
and 40 women in an at-risk test group (weight > 90 kg, weight gain > 2
0 kg, previous macrosomic baby, history of shoulder dystocial difficul
t delivery, clinical suspicion of a large baby). Women with a breech f
etus, twins and those not able to deliver vaginally were excluded. Met
hods Fetal shoulders were measured from the convergence of the cervica
l spinous processes at the approximate cervicothoracic vertebral junct
ion to the medial border of the humeral head. Correlations were made w
ith maternal body mass, birth weight, birth weight estimation, ultraso
und and postnatal humerospinous measurements. Results One case of shou
lder dystocia in a fetus with an average humerospinous measurement occ
urred in the reference group and there were no cases in the test group
. There was no predictive value of a large humerospinous measurement a
nd no correlation with maternal or fetal size. Movement of the fetal a
rm could change the humerospinous distance considerably, which could a
ccount for the difference between a normal and large measurement. Conc
lusion The humerospinous distance cannot be used to predict shoulder d
ystocia.