C. Igathinathane et Pk. Chattopadhyay, NUMERICAL TECHNIQUES FOR ESTIMATING THE SURFACE-AREAS OF ELLIPSOIDS REPRESENTING FOOD MATERIALS, Journal of agricultural engineering research (Print), 70(4), 1998, pp. 313-322
Food materials (seeds, grains, fruits and vegetables) resembling the s
hape of a general ellipsoid were modelled for accurate determination o
f surface area from measurements of their three principal dimensions.
The process of surface area estimation involved partitioning the ellip
soid into an appropriate number of elliptical discs, determination of
the surface areas of the edges of the discs and summing them to obtain
the total surface area. Two types of perimeters were used to determin
e the edge surface areas: (1) the average perimeter; and (2) the root
mean square perimeter. For edge length, three measures were considered
: (1) parallel to the axis; (2) inclined to the axis; and (3) length o
f the elliptical are. Six different surface area models were developed
by combining the two perimeters with the three edge lengths and these
were validated against exact analytical solutions for a sphere, prola
te spheroid and oblate spheroid. The models with parallel edge length
always produced the greatest underestimate of surface area and they ca
nnot, in fact, give accurate results, even if a large number of discs
is used. The models with inclined and elliptic are edge length perform
ed well in the entire range of width/length of prolate spheroids and t
hickness/length of oblate spheroids. For practical computations involv
ing the general ellipsoid, a minimum of 100 discs was found to be suff
icient, as it produced a maximum deviation of less than +/- 0.1% from
1000 discs for all the models and geometries considered. The performan
ces of two approximate formulae for the surface area of the general el
lipsoid were also studied for comparison but they were suitable only i
n the near-spherical range. Predictions were made and compared with th
e reported surface areas for a few paddy varieties, which were experim
entally determined by previous researchers, and were found to deviate
within + 7.0 to + 30.0%. (C) 1998 Silsoe Research Institute.