This article argues against a recent development within angle-phone po
litical philosophy which treats almost all group conflicts as deriving
from cultural differences, thus downplaying the notion that conflicts
may simply be over the distribution of things to which all the partic
ipants attach value: power, money, land and so on. Normative political
philosophy, it is claimed by those who take this view should be prima
rily concerned with issues of identity, recognition and culture at the
expense of issues concerning distribution. There is however little ba
sis for these claims, whose implications are sketched in here and form
the foundation for a defence of a liberalism 'that has confidence in
its own insights, a liberalism possessed of clarity as well as compass
ion'.