Jp. Leyens et al., WHY AND UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES IS A HYPOTHESIS-CONSISTENT TESTING STRATEGY PREFERRED IN INTERVIEWS, British journal of social psychology, 37, 1998, pp. 259-274
Two studies examined hypothesis-consistent questions under goals of in
formation seeking and empathy. In Study 1, observers rated the informa
tiveness and empathy of questions classified as diagnostic or leading,
and as matching or not matching a hypothesis (extroversion-introversi
on). In an impression formation setting, observers rated both matching
and diagnostic questions as especially informative, but in an impress
ion Verification setting, they rated leading questions as especially i
nformative. Across settings, matching and leading questions both displ
ayed empathy. In Study 2, participants expected to interview an introv
erted or extroverted person, under either an information-seeking or an
empathy goal. Interviewers favoured matching questions, especially un
der an empathy goal. Interviewers also selected more diagnostic than l
eading questions. Interviewers and observers both consider matching qu
estions informative, with the added benefit of showing empathy to smoo
th the interaction.