RISK AND DECISION-ANALYSIS OF GROUNDWATER PROTECTION ALTERNATIVES ON THE EUROPEAN SCALE WITH EMPHASIS ON NITRATE AND ALUMINUM CONTAMINATIONFROM DIFFUSE SOURCES
L. Rosen et al., RISK AND DECISION-ANALYSIS OF GROUNDWATER PROTECTION ALTERNATIVES ON THE EUROPEAN SCALE WITH EMPHASIS ON NITRATE AND ALUMINUM CONTAMINATIONFROM DIFFUSE SOURCES, Journal of hazardous materials, 61(1-3), 1998, pp. 329-336
Stochastic simulation of nitrate and aluminium contamination of ground
water from diffuse sources on the European scale was performed. The re
sults were used for two purposes in this paper: (1) to describe possib
le economical implications resulting from the uncertainties in contami
nant modelling on the European scale and (2) to perform societal monet
ary decision analysis on alternatives to reduce contamination risks. T
he risk was treated as a probabilistic cost for exceeding existing wat
er quality standards. A risk-cost minimization model was used for the
decision analysis, considering all investment costs and risks of each
alternative. The analysis was performed using the Netherlands as a stu
dy area and the cost of failure was based on the value of groundwater
as a drinking water resource. The risk reduction alternatives included
in the analysis were two emission reduction scenarios given by the II
ASA RAINS model: the Current Reduction Plans (CRP) scenario and the Ma
ximum Feasible Reductions (MFR) scenario. The study indicates that the
uncertainties result in prediction intervals for the economical outco
mes of the two scenarios of 2.7 to 5.1 billion ECUs over a 15-year sim
ulation period. The study also indicates that the CRP scenario is the
economically most advantageous alternative, given the economical assum
ptions made. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.