The past fifty years of antiarrhythmic drug development have seen Limi
ted success in prolonging life and reducing morbidity. It is likely th
at arrhythmias are in most instances final common pathways through whi
ch changes in the cardiac substrate and in trigger mechanisms are expr
essed. We propose that the development and administration of therapies
for the arrhythmias themselves, while offering a panacea for a diseas
e entity that has evolved and is being overtly manifested, is also an
admission of failure to identify and prevent evolution of the substrat
e and triggers such that arrhythmias can occur. We suggest that while
strategies for treatment and prevention of recurrence of arrhythmias s
till warrant exploration, greater hope for the future lies in identify
ing means for earlier diagnosis of the arrhythmogenic substrate and tr
iggers, and in developing therapies that are ''upstream'' to the arrhy
thmia and prevent their initial expression. Means to achieve this end
are suggested, using specific arrhythmias as examples. Similarly, to i
ncrease the likelihood that clinical studies of new therapies can be s
uccessfully concluded and interpreted, we suggest new approaches to pa
tient selection, risk stratification, trial endpoints, outcome events
and trial methodologies.