Jn. Eule et Jd. Varat, TRANSPORTING FIRST-AMENDMENT NORMS TO THE PRIVATE-SECTOR - WITH EVERYWISH THERE COMES A CURSE, UCLA law review, 45(6), 1998, pp. 1537-1634
Providing legal protection against free speech restrictions adopted by
private groups, schools, employers, property owners, and other source
s of private power has seemed to many a natural and appealing extensio
n of this nation's powerful attachment to First Amendment limits on go
vernmental restraint of speech-in part because of the sheer value of t
he free speech norm, and in part due to impatience with the instabilit
y and insufficient grounding of the public/private distinction reflect
ed in state action doctrine. This Article identifies, and traces the d
evelopment of, three alternate routes driven by this desire to restric
t private power over private speech-judicial interpretation expansivel
y applying the First Amendment itself to some seemingly private actors
, similarly expansive judicial interpretation of free speech provision
s in state constitutions, and legislative imposition of free speech no
rms on private parties. The often overlooked or insufficiently appreci
ated speech-redistributive effects of these approaches are highlighted
and explored, as are the institutional and substantive drawbacks acco
mpanying either their implementation or efforts to tame their inherent
implications. In addition to advocating greater sensitivity to, and w
ariness about, the pitfalls encountered along these ''transporting'' r
outes-particularly the legislative route-this Article, using statutory
imposed free speech obligations on private universities as a primary
example, first examines a variety of extant constitutional doctrines p
otentially available to private speech regulators to resist compelled
adherence to First Amendment norms, and then suggests more fundamental
ly that categorical governmental imposition of First Amendment obligat
ions on private parties presumptively conflicts with the First Amendme
nt's core protection against government-compelled orthodoxy-including
a government-compelled orthodoxy of the First Amendment itself.