ASSESSMENT OF SMALL-DIAMETER AORTIC MECHANICAL PROSTHESES - PHYSIOLOGICAL RELEVANCE OF THE DOPPLER GRADIENT, UTILITY OF FLOW AUGMENTATION, AND LIMITATIONS OF ORIFICE AREA ESTIMATION
Rh. Marcus et al., ASSESSMENT OF SMALL-DIAMETER AORTIC MECHANICAL PROSTHESES - PHYSIOLOGICAL RELEVANCE OF THE DOPPLER GRADIENT, UTILITY OF FLOW AUGMENTATION, AND LIMITATIONS OF ORIFICE AREA ESTIMATION, Circulation, 98(9), 1998, pp. 866-872
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Peripheal Vascular Diseas",Hematology,"Cardiac & Cardiovascular System
Background-Noninvasive assessment of functionally stenotic small-diame
ter aortic mechanical prostheses is complicated by theoretical constra
ints relating to the hemodynamic relevance of Doppler-derived transpro
sthetic gradients. To establish the utility of Doppler echocardiograph
y for evaluation of these valves, 20-mm Medtronic Hall and 19-mm St Ju
de prostheses were studied in vitro and in vivo. Methods aad Results-R
elations between the orifice transprosthetic gradient (equivalent to D
oppler), the downstream gradient in the zone of recovered pressure (eq
uivalent to catheter), and fluid mechanical energy losses were examine
d in vitro. Pressure-flow relations across the 2 prostheses were evalu
ated by Doppler echocardiography in vivo. For both types of prosthesis
in vitro, the orifice was higher than the downstream gradient (P<0.00
1), and fluid mechanical energy losses were as strongly correlated wit
h orifice as with downstream pressure gradients (r(2)=0.99 for both).
Orifice and downstream gradients were higher and fluid mechanical ener
gy losses were larger for the St Jude than the Medtronic Hall valve (a
ll P<0.001). Whereas estimated effective orifice areas for the 2 valve
s in vivo were not significantly different, model-independent dynamic
analysis of pressure-flow relations revealed higher gradients for the
St Jude than the Medtronic Hall valve at a given flow rate (P<0.05). C
onclusions-Even in the presence of significant pressure recovery, the
Doppler-derived gradient across small-diameter aortic mechanical prost
heses does have hemodynamic relevance insofar as it reflects myocardia
l energy expenditure. Small differences in function between stenotic a
ortic mechanical prostheses, undetectable by conventional orifice area
estimations, can be identified by dynamic Doppler echocardiographic a
nalysis of pressure-flow relations.