Power averages are often used to estimate the effective permeability o
f a region based on sample measurements. Since the average is computed
from a limited number of samples, it may suffer bias and sampling var
iation. Expressions for bias and sampling variation are derived here f
or averages having any exponent value between +1 (arithmetic average)
and -1 (harmonic average). The derivations assume independent, lognorm
ally distributed samples. The expressions agree with known results for
the arithmetic, geometric, and harmonic averages. Estimator bias is g
enerally smaller than 15% for common levels of permeability variabilit
y and sample numbers. Sampling variability, however, may be a consider
able fraction of the true mean. If sampling schemes aim to collect suf
ficient data to keep the harmonic average within acceptable tolerances
, other averages will meet or better that tolerance.