The environmental adaptation hypothesis (EAH) regarding birdsong diale
cts or neighbourhoods states that song similarities between neighbouri
ng individuals arise because of common influences on their songs exert
ed by the acoustic environment of their habitat. An assumption of the
hypothesis is that sounds are distorted differently by different types
of habitat. A prediction of the hypothesis is that some songs or part
s of songs transmit better than others, depending on the habitat of th
eir origin. We tested the assumption and prediction by comparing the a
ttenuation and differential attenuation of pure tones, decreases in mo
dal frequencies of computer simulated songs of American redstarts (Set
ophaga ruticilla), and the decay of redstart songs and white noise at
deciduous, coniferous and open forest sites. The songs were representa
tive of those used by redstarts living in the three habitats. Results
supported the assumption of acoustic differences between habitats but
did not support the prediction that some songtypes transmit with less
distortion in specific habitats than in others. The EAH also predicts
that individuals which inhabit similar vegetation should share more so
ng features than individuals which inhabitat dissimilar vegetation. To
test this prediciton samples of songs were taken from the three habit
ats in different years. There were significant associations by habitat
in both samples, but only one of several variables measured was signi
ficant and the discriminating variable was not the same for the two pe
riods. Considering together the tests of the assumption and the two pr
edictions, we conclude that for American redstarts evidence of the inf
luence of the acoustic features of habitat on the formation of song di
alects is mixed and not convincing.