Selective foraging by large mammals can change ecosystem properties su
ch as plant species composition, nutrient cycling rates, and soil fert
ility. These changes, in turn, alter the availability of forage and co
uld affect the relative efficiencies of foraging strategies used by th
ese animals. We used a simulation model to predict how alternate forag
ing strategies affected the net annual energy balance of moose (Alces
alces), moose density, and distribution of browse across the landscape
. The model simulates the spatial distribution of vegetation in an 8-h
a landscape of 1-m(2) cells with seasonal changes in the energetic nee
ds of free-ranging moose and plant phenology. The energetics model was
integrated with a moose population model and a plant-growth model for
long-term simulations. Changes in bite density in each feeding statio
n are predicted with height and biomass logistic curves modified by a
quadratic response to browsing. We tested foraging strategies using ra
ndom, fractional, and marginal value theorem (MVT) algorithms on lands
capes with a range of bite densities and differing spatial distributio
ns. Small-scale disturbances (that is, treefall gaps) were required to
maintain browse supply and prevent moose population extinction under
all foraging strategies. Populations using a fractional stopping rule
survived the 100-year simulations because moose browsed across much of
the landscape and did not overbrowse patches with high bite density.
Populations using random and MVT stopping rules became extinct in abou
t 25 and about 50 years, respectively. Moose using a random stopping r
ule were in negative energy balance because travel time was high and t
he net energy intake rate was low on an annual basis. Moose using the
MVT stopping rule were initially in positive energy balance, but as th
e high-density browse patches were overbrowsed and low-density unbrows
ed patches grew out of reach, bite density decreased, and energy balan
ce became negative in subsequent years. Thus, the foraging strategy us
ed by individual moose resulted in creation of landscapes that strongl
y affected browse density, browse distribution, moose population densi
ty, and moose survival.