A BAYESIAN HIERARCHICAL SURVIVAL MODEL FOR THE INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTS IN A MULTICENTER CANCER CLINICAL-TRIAL

Citation
Y. Matsuyama et al., A BAYESIAN HIERARCHICAL SURVIVAL MODEL FOR THE INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTS IN A MULTICENTER CANCER CLINICAL-TRIAL, Statistics in medicine, 17(17), 1998, pp. 1893-1908
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Statistic & Probability","Medicine, Research & Experimental","Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath","Statistic & Probability","Medical Informatics
Journal title
ISSN journal
02776715
Volume
17
Issue
17
Year of publication
1998
Pages
1893 - 1908
Database
ISI
SICI code
0277-6715(1998)17:17<1893:ABHSMF>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
In randomized clinical trials comparing treatment effects on diseases such as cancer, a multi-centre trial is usually conducted to accrue th e required number of patients in a reasonable period of time. While we interpret the average treatment effect, it is necessary to examine th e homogeneity of the observed treatment effects across institutions, t hat is, treatment-by-institution interaction. If the homogeneity is co nfirmed, the conclusions concerning treatment effects can be generaliz ed to a broader patient population. In this paper, a Bayesian hierarch ical survival model is used to investigate the institutional effects o n the efficacy of treatment as well as on the baseline risk. The margi nal posterior distributions are estimated by a Markov chain Monte Carl o method, that is, Gibbs sampling, to overcome current computational l imitations. The robustness of the inferences to the distributional ass umption for the random effects is also examined. We illustrate the met hods with analyses of data from a multi-centre cancer clinical trial, which investigated the efficacy of immunochemotherapy as an adjuvant t reatment after curative resection of gastric cancer. In this trial the re is little difference in the treatment effects across institutions a nd the treatment is shown to be effective, while there appears to be s ubstantial variation in the baseline risk across institutions. This re sult indicates that the observed treatment effects might be generalize d to a broader patient population. (C) 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.