Linear evenly spaced point transects are typically used to measure per
cent of the soil surface covered by crop residue or canopy. As few as
five 100-point count transects provide relatively precise measures of
uniformly distributed cover but such transects can provide very poor p
recision if used to measure cover lying in parallel rows. Highly varia
ble counts can be expected if the target occupies evenly spaced parall
el stripes with alternating high (80% or more) and low (20% or less) c
ovet: Precise means (S.D. < 5%) of cover on striped surfaces can be ob
tained with equally spaced point transects if both point spacing and t
ransect angle relative to tillage or planting rows are custom-selected
for each pow spacing. However no single equal point spacing or transe
ct angle will provide precise cover estimates at all planter and tilla
ge tool row spacings used in agricultural fields It is hypothesized th
at nonuniform point spacings will allow estimates of cover that are in
dependent of transect angle on striped surfaces. The hypothesis was te
sted using the variance in counts of intersections between the point d
istributions and regularly striped geometric patterns. The standard de
viation of intersection counts from randomly spaced point transects ra
nged between 5 and 10% cover; but was independent of transect angle an
d row spacing. A sinewave-like point spacing also produced cover estim
ates that were independent of transect angle and row spacing. The adva
ntages of a sinewave pattern are the following: it is unique in contra
st to the large number of possible random spacings, it can be used on
any row spacing, and it usually provides a lower standard deviation th
an that obtained from randomly spaced points. The sinewave pattern sha
res with evenly spaced points the disadvantage that non-random points
do not meet the strict requirements SOP statistical sampling. Randomly
spaced point transects are recommended for percent cover estimates on
fields with visible striping.