BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic neosalpingostomies can be time consuming, cos
tly and technically difficult, resulting in suboptimal results in inex
perienced hands. Extracorporeal techniques for pelvic and abdominal or
gans have already been previously reported in the literature, involvin
g such organs as the appendix, ovary and small bowel. CASE: A 33-year-
old white woman, gravida 0, diagnosed with a history of primary infert
ility, underwent diagnostic laparoscopy/hysteroscopy. Stage IV endomet
riosis was diagnosed and was accompanied with bilateral tubal occlusio
n with complete obliteration of the fimbriae bilaterally Extracorporea
lization of the fallopian tubes was performed,followed by microsurgica
l neosalpingostomies. Operative time for both neosalpingostomies was 2
0 minutes. CONCLUSION: When controlled for tubal mucosa integrity, pre
vious data from one researcher comparing microsurgical laparotomy and
laparoscopic neosalpingostomies shows a higher fertility rate with ope
n surgical techniques. This may be explained, in part, by suboptimal r
epair of the distal tubes by a laparoscopic technique. This extracorpo
real technique may aid in shorter surgery and anesthesia times, higher
intrauterine pregnancy rates and higher successful surgical completio
ns. Prospective evaluation of multiple patients will be necessary to a
ssess its efficacy. Even if pregnancy rates do not differ, operative t
ime and cost may be significantly reduced.