This paper examines the strengths and weaknesses of citizens' juries a
s a model for public involvement in health care. It does so through ob
servation of two citizens' juries run by the same Health Authority, du
ring the summer of 1996. The framework used to evaluate the juries is
that provided by IPPR in their 1997 Report, namely focusing on lire th
emes of information, time, scrutiny, deliberation, independence and au
thority. Citizens' juries are compared and contrasted with other model
s for public involvement and linked with the broader debate on citizen
ship theory and practice.