Sm. Donfield et al., COMPARABILITY OF ABSOLUTE PERCENT CD4+ T-LYMPHOCYTES COMPLETED LOCALLY AND CENTRALLY/, Controlled clinical trials, 19(5), 1998, pp. 451-460
Citations number
10
Categorie Soggetti
Medicine, Research & Experimental","Pharmacology & Pharmacy
The Hemophilia Growth and Development Study (HGDS) is a multicenter lo
ngitudinal study of 333 male children and adolescents with moderate or
severe hemophilia, ranging in age from 6 to 19 at entry. Sixty-two pe
rcent of the cohort was infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HI
V) in the late 1970s and early 1980s through exposure to contaminated
clotting factor concentrates. The HGDS has followed this cohort since
1989. HGDS subjects have blood drawn twice each year for t-lymphocyte
subsets, with fresh blood shipped overnight to a central laboratory. T
-lymphocyte subsets from the same blood draw are often determined loca
lly as well. To evaluate interlaboratory variation, we examined the co
mparability of pairs of local and central results for CD4+ absolute co
unts and percents. Ninety-four pairs of absolute counts and 73 pairs o
f percent CD4+ results were available. We calculated concordance corre
lation coefficients, which evaluate the agreement between two readings
from the sample by measuring the variation from the 45 degrees line t
hrough the origin. Absolute counts were square root transformed. Compa
rability of the pairs was high for both absolute counts and percents (
0.93 and 0.92, respectively). Agreement was high whether we determined
the CD4+ counts and percents centrally, using fresh samples received
the day after the examination (0.95, 0.95), or from specimens that wer
e frozen upon receipt and batched for later testing (0.90, 0.87). We c
onclude that when a centrally processed CD4+ result is unavailable bec
ause of shipping problems or loss of specimens, a study may reasonably
accept a CD4+ result completed locally, if validity checks indicate g
ood comparability. In the HGDS, the data provided by the local laborat
ories were of comparable quality to those provided by the central labo
ratories. (C) Elsevier Science Inc. 1998.