M. Andrewscasal et al., CLEFT-LIP WITH OR WITHOUT CLEFT-PALATE - EFFECT OF FAMILY HISTORY ON REPRODUCTIVE PLANNING, SURGICAL TIMING, AND PARENTAL STRESS, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal, 35(1), 1998, pp. 52-57
Objective: This study tested whether the presence of a family history
of nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (NSCLP) lessens
the negative impact on reproductive planning, decreases treatment anx
iety, and relieves parental stress when there is a recurrent cleft. De
sign: Sixty-one participating families, retrospectively ascertained th
rough their children with NSCLP, were divided into two groups: those w
ith a family history of clefting and those in which only the proband w
as affected. Setting: Each family completed a questionnaire either at
their home or during a clinic visit. Participants: Questionnaires were
distributed to 117 families with an NSCLP child. Of these 117, 49 (42
%) had another family member with NSCLP and 68 (58%) had no prior hist
ory of clefting, Sixty-one (52%) families returned the questionnaire a
nd were categorized by family history. Main Outcome Measures: The Pare
nting Stess Index and the Hollingshead Index of Social Position were i
ncluded with family and medical history questions in the 137-item ques
tionnaire. Results: The reproductive plans of the two groups were quit
e similar and were not dependent on the families' actual or perceived
recurrence risks of NSCLP. The majority (85%) of the children with NSC
LP underwent surgical closure at the recommended age. The two groups d
id not significantly differ on any score on the Parenting Stress Index
, indicating a similar parental stress level between the groups, Concl
usions: These findings suggest that family history does not significan
tly influence reproductive plans, timing of cleft repair, or stress of
parents of a child with NSCLP Further, these results indicate a need
for additional psychosocial study of this population.